Evaluation of GeoGebra Implementation in Schools: A Combined TAM and IS Success Model Approach

Authors

  • Muhammad Agreindra Helmiawan Universitas Sebelas April

Keywords:

Technology Acceptance, IS Success, Mathematics, Technology, GeoGebra

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of GeoGebra in mathematics education by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model and the Information Systems Success Model. The hybrid model enables a multifaceted assessment, capturing both user acceptance and the broader organisational impacts of the technology. Quantitative data, gathered through surveys and statistical analysis, measures GeoGebra adoption, perceived usefulness, and ease of use among teachers and students. Qualitative data, collected through interviews, focus groups, and classroom observations, provides insights into the experiences of teachers and students using GeoGebra. Data analysis involves descriptive and inferential statistics to compare user perceptions and examine the relationships between variables, such as the impact of perceived usefulness and system quality on user satisfaction and behavioural intention. The findings offer practical consequences for educational institutions and mathematics teachers wishing to successfully incorporate GeoGebra into their mathematics curriculum by addressing technical complexity and providing sufficient assistance

References

L. G. Mokotjo and M. L. Mokhele, “Challenges of Integrating GeoGebra in the Teaching of Mathematics in South African High Schools,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 963–973, May 2021, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2021.090509.

L. A. Daulay, Syafipah, A. K. P. Nasution, M. Tohir, Y. Simamora, and R. Saragih, “Geogebra assisted blended learning on students’ spatial geometry ability,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1839, no. 1, p. 12009, May 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012009.

M. Pittalis, “Extending the technology acceptance model to evaluate teachers’ intention to use dynamic geometry software in geometry teaching,” Int J Math Educ Sci Technol, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1385–1404, May 2020, doi: 10.1080/0020739x.2020.1766139.

B. et al and D. et al, “Perceptions of MSME Actors on the Utilization of AI to Improve Productivity and Marketing,” May 2021.

B. Gunawan Sudarsono, A. Subiyakto, and A. Binti Abd. Rahman, “Benefit Realization Model of Information System Strategic Planning Success: A Proposed Model,” no. Icri 2018, pp. 3124–3134, 2020, doi: 10.5220/0009948331243134.

M. A. Hossain, A. Tiwari, S. Saha, A. Ghimire, M. A. U. Imran, and R. Khatoon, “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Information Technology System to Evaluate the Adoption of Decision Support System,” Journal of Computer and Communications, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 242–256, May 2024, doi: 10.4236/jcc.2024.128015.

D. Yuniarto, D. Herdiana, and D. Indra Junaedi, “Smart Farming Precision Agriculture Project Success based on Information Technology Capability,” 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268807.

A. Ekuase-Anwansedo, J. Noguera, and B. Dumas, “Transitioning from Blackboard to Moodle amidst Natural Disaster: Faculty and Students Perceptions,” arXiv (Cornell University), May 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10523

S. Zaineldeen, H. Li, A. L. Koffi, and B. M. A. Hassan, “Technology Acceptance Model’ Concepts, Contribution, Limitation, and Adoption in Education,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 5061–5071, May 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081106.

N. Matar, T. AlMalahmeh, M. J. Aladaileh, and S. Al Jaghoub, “Factors Affecting Behavioral Intentions towards Cloud Computing in the Workplace: A Case Analysis for Jordanian Universities,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 15, no. 16, p. 31, May 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14811.

S. Aripiyanto, F. E. M. Agustin, F. P. Saputrie, Y. Durrachman, D. Khairani, and H. T. Sukmana, “Evaluation of User Experience in the Lecture Activity Menu of AIS Mobile for Student Using Heuristic Evaluation, System Usability Scale and User Experience Questionnaire,” in 2024 12th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–7.

A. I. A. Thani, S. R. Sakarji, A. K. A. Thani, and N. N. M. Z. N. Zainuddin, “Evaluation of the ‘e-Kursus’ System Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Institute for Rural Advancement (INFRA), Bangi as a Case Study,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, May 2022, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i3/12335.

E. Firmansyah, M. A. Helmiawan, I. Fadil, F. Mahardika, D. Budiana, and R. R. Marliana, “Integrated Academic Information System Based on The Perception of Ease And Benefits,” in 2022 10th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6.

F. Esa, H. Muhammad Agreindra, R. Ali, S. Maya, and A. R. Aedah, “Examining Readiness of E-Learning Implementation Using Aydin and Tasci Model: A Rural University Case Study in Indonesia,” 2021.

M. Helmiawan, I. Fadil, D. Yuniarto, F. Mahardika, and F. Supriadi, “Improving the detection of plagiarism in scientific articles using machine learning approaches,” in Selected Papers from the 1st International Conference on Islam, Science and Technology, ICONISTECH-1 2019, 11-12 July 2019, Bandung, Indonesia, 2020.

W. W. Than, E. M. Kyaw, and H. Z. Htoo, “A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology in Higher Education,” International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 44–71, May 2021, doi: 10.53378/352074.

M. A. Helmiawan and A. I. Nasution, “The Effect of Internet Banking Use and Customer Protection Against Cyber Crime at Bank Rakyat Indonesia,” Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 170–183, 2022.

E. O. López-Caudana, M. Soledad, S. M. Pérez, and G. Rodríguez-Abitia, “Using Robotics to Enhance Active Learning in Mathematics: A Multi-Scenario Study,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 2163, May 2020, doi: 10.3390/math8122163.

R. Hidayat, W. N. W. M. Noor, N. Nasir, and A. F. M. Ayub, “The role of GeoGebra software in conceptual understanding and engagement among secondary school student,” Infinity Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 317–332, May 2024, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p317-332.

R. Huda and Abd. Qohar, “Student activeness and understanding in mathematics learning using GeoGebra application on the trigonometry ratio topic,” AIP Conf Proc, vol. 2330, p. 40034, May 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0043140.

K. Lavidas et al., “Predicting the Behavioral Intention of Greek University Faculty Members to Use Moodle,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 6290, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15076290.

I. Benning, C. Linsell, and N. Ingram, “Examining the changes in mathematics teachers’ technology dispositions through GeoGebra-mediated professional development,” Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–63, May 2023, doi: 10.1177/27527263231163276.

B. B. Chalaune and A. Subedi, “Effectiveness of GeoGebra in teaching school mathematics,” Contemporary Research An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–58, May 2020, doi: 10.3126/craiaj.v4i1.32729.

G. Dash and J. Paul, “CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 173, p. 121092, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092.

Y. Wang, “An empirical study on the users’ continuous intention of imported cross-border e-commerce platforms based on TAM and perceived risk theory,” vol. 9, pp. 237–241, May 2020, doi: 10.1145/3422713.3422760.

V. Maria and L. B. Sugiyanto, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment on behavioral intention to use through trust,” Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, May 2023, doi: 10.55324/ijoms.v3i1.702.

S. Davoodi, L. Akbarpour, and E. Hadipour, “Investigating the Effects of Subjective Norms and Trialability on English Teachers` Attitude toward the Use of Technology,” Vision Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 159–172, May 2021, doi: 10.21580/vjv10i17431.

J. Zhao, S. Li, and J. Zhang, “Understanding Teachers’ Adoption of AI Technologies: An Empirical Study from Chinese Middle Schools,” Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 302, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/systems13040302.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-25